-
Sunday Morning Reading
I’m not sure about how you’re viewing all the things swirling around us these days and maybe it’s just the prism I’m seeing the world through, but most of the writing that attracts me all seems to relate. The common denominator is human arrogance, (perhaps it’s arrogant for me to say that). On the other hand is the push back against it, whether it be in global or national affairs, technology, or simply finding a new way to connect in what seems like old ways. Anyway, that’s a thread running through my mind as I share this week’s Sunday Morning Reading.

Freedom of Speech and Disinformation are two sides of the same worn coin that I’m afraid is on the verge of losing any of the value it once represented. Ian Dunt says that Progressives Are Rediscovering Freedom of Speech after the populists essentially used it as a cleaver to butcher it.
On the other side of that coin, Mathew Ingram says that Disinformation Isn’t A Supply Problem It’s a Demand Problem, asking how do you correct a belief?
In a world were some want to remake it in an image that excludes those it deems undesirable, it turns out some Far-Right Influencers Are Hosting a $10K—Person Matchmaking Weekend To Repopulate The Earth. Manisha Krishnan tells the story in Wired.
Speaking of humanity, Thom Hartmann thinks, Even Mice Have More Humanity Than Trump, Musk and the GOP. He’s right.
Timothy Snyder has one of the best pieces I’ve seen on SignalGate called SignalGate: Violating National Security. It doesn’t get more simple than that title, and yet, we’re in a world where we let it get stupid, silly, and so much more complicated than it needed to be.
Greenlanders seem to be pushing back with a bit more tenacity than most Americans want to muster at the moment. Sarah Ditum offers A Tip For JD Vance: Greenland Doesn’t Care About Your Frail Human Ego.
On the technology front, Artificial Intelligence keeps dominating most discussions. Steven Levy takes a look inside Anthropic and its version with Anthropic’s Claude Is Good At Poetry-And Bullshitting. Here’s the thing that always makes me laugh about AI fluffing and fulminating. We keep playing circular games with these things, creating them, we’re told, to be better than our falliable selves at reasoning and to be more efficient to free our minds from drudgery. We are good at the creating part yet seemingly not smart enough to recognize the fallibility in all of our arrogant bullshitting. We’re obviously not smart enough to recognize that, so what makes anyone think anything artificial we create will do any better?
Apple continues stewing in juices of its own making as it heads into its next cycle of OS releases, leaving many aching for the days of Snow Leopard, a release which supposedly was aimed at bug fixes more than new features. Matt Birchler reminds us that this was one of those bullshit marketing myths too many fell for in The Snow Leopard We’ve Built Up In Our Heads and links to a terrific rundown of why that was indeed a myth from Jeff Johnson in The Myth And Reality of Mac OS X Snow Leopard.
As for the pushing back part of today’s introduction, take a look back, or listen back in cultural history at this piece in OpenCulture. Turns out after World War II, as the KKK was once again gaining some momentum, Superman stepped in to help slow things down. Check out Superman Vs. The KKK: Hear The 1946 Superman Radio Show That Weakened The Klan.
Watering holes are great places for connecting with other humans whether it be for refreshment, survival, or merely just a human connection. David Todd McCarty publishing on LinkedIn takes a look at The Return of The Speakeasy, reminding us that nothing was or is easy.
Image from Michael Constantine on Unsplash
If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here. You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.
-
“Improper Ideology.” How Long Before They Just Call It Degenerate Art?
It’s only a matter of time before the Nazis currently running America into the ground recycle Degenerative Art as a naming convention. At this point I’m not sure what’s holding them back giving their predilection for attacking anything other than the privileged white bread culture they seem to love. Although I doubt many of them actually eat white bread.

Doing his worst to try and remake culture and history into something most of the world has left behind, Trump yesterday issued another of his plans. This time it’s directed at the Smithsonian Institution proclaiming that there has been a concerted and widespread effort to replace the “objective facts” of American History with a “distorted narrative.” Oh, yeah, it’s now called “improper ideology.”
The Nazis played a similar game with history and culture, labeling some of the art they didn’t like, or that didn’t support the world they wanted to create, as “degenerate art.” Funny though that those same goons sent troops all over Europe to snatch and grab quite a bit of that artwork for their own personal use. Go ahead, tell me who were the real degenerates.
As I said, I’m not sure why the cowards in this administration haven’t stolen the “degenerate art” label for themselves, while they are stealing everything else. I’m sure there’s a Signal thread running around discussing it somewhere.
I don’t need to lay out why this is bad and yes, stupid. The Smithsonian isn’t the only target and other cultural institutions are on the list, of course the most prominent prior to this being The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. There have been and will continue to be many more sad and horrific days with horrific and misguided attempts at forcing blinders over muzzles.
At some point those you try to muzzle bite back.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
-
The Severance Lumon Terminal Pro Computer Is Now On The Apple Store
Severance is quite a streaming hit for Apple TV+ and Apple is going all in on hyping the show and it’s Mac computers on the Apple Store.

To push a behind the scenes look at the editing of Severance on Mac computers Apple added a pro version of the Lumon computer used in the show to the Apple Store website. Of course, they added the Pro version. You can visit the page while it’s still around by going to the Apple website and selecting Mac, then selecting The Lumon Terminal Pro at the top of the page. The video link is included on that webpage.
By the way, the behind the scenes video of the editing process using Macs and Apple software is quite good and worth a watch.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
-
The Atlantic Releases War Plans that Supposedly Are Not War Plans
Whoo boy. We’re splitting pubic hairs and redefining words as fast as taking a breath allows.

The Atlantic released the contents of the Signal chat between U.S. National Security Officials and The Atlantic’s editor Jeffrey Goldberg. This comes after denials that any classified information have been flying fast and furious from those under fire for being so arrogantly careless.
Who knows where this story is going to go. Like a turd in a toilet bowl it can either be flushed or remain a floater. We’re effectively in an endlessly swirling toilet waiting to see. But sure, let’s spend time debating the difference between war plans and attack plans, what’s classified and what’s not. It’s been said a million times, so I guess it really doesn’t matter, but these are not serious people.
The whole world used to be watching. Now they’re just laughing. At some point this comedy of errors is going to end in real tragedy.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
-
Shared Apple Reminders That Never Disappear
Maybe one day Apple will find time to fix this bug with shared Reminders. Maybe not, given all that it keeps piling on its seemingly overflowing plate these days.

Here’s the thing. Apple has a nifty feature to share lists and Reminders in the Reminders app. It allows you to create a list and share it among family, friends, or perhaps even National Security officials but I haven’t heard of it being used that way. Yet.
It works as advertised when it comes to actually sharing a Reminder. My wife and I use it for grocery and other shopping lists. If she’s doing an inventory through the cabinets prior to a grocery run, I’ll get notifications of the Reminders she adds to the list.
The problem pokes its head up after those Reminders are completed. Those notifications don’t disappear the way non-shared Reminders do. They hang around. Seemingly forever. At least in my case, sometimes for hours.
The two Reminders in the image above are from my iMac. My wife added them after I had already headed to the store on a day of errands. They were still there hours after I had checked them off in the Shared Reminders list on my iPhone. The notifications still remained on my iPhone as well.
You have to manually get rid of these Shared Reminder notifications, which seems like a silly bug to me. It’s been around since Shared Reminders was introduced in iOS 13. It’s a shame it’s been around so long because Apple has done a good job over the years evolving the Reminders app into something that’s really useful.
Perhaps Apple Intelligence will figure out a way to fix this somewhere down the line. I won’t set a shared Reminder to check on that though.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
-
Lord, What Fools These Mortals Be
Make no mistake, the folks Donald Trump has chosen for his cabinet are mortal. They are also fools.

According to Jeffery Goldberg, Editor-in-Chief of The Atlantic, they were communicating via the messaging app Signal, about recent military plans to strike Houthi rebels in Yemen. Bad enough in and of itself, but they also included journalist Goldberg in on the plans.
According to Goldberg:
The world found out shortly before 2 p.m. eastern time on March 15 that the United States was bombing Houthi targets across Yemen.
I, however, knew two hours before the first bombs exploded that the attack might be coming. The reason I knew this is that Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, had texted me the war plan at 11:44 a.m. The plan included precise information about weapons packages, targets, and timing.
This is going to require some explaining. […]
And explain he does in this article which includes images from some of the messages between Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Vice President J.D. Vance, Stephen Miller, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and more. Don’t worry. Goldberg does a better job of protecting sensitive data than the culprits do.
Obviously everyone but those in the cult of knee-benders and compliant media knows already that these guys are incompetent fools. Perhaps now the media will start calling this ship of fools out for what it actually is.
I don’t wonder at their incompetence or reckless behavior. I just wonder why they aren’t using government secure channels to do their dirty work. Has Elon Musk locked them out of that too?
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
-
Scorched Apple Trust
Trust is not an easy thing to earn. It’s far easier to burn. When it catches fire, it quickly consumes whatever is in its path. Such a conflagration is made worse when it singes those who have long cozied up, supported, and promulgated that trust as their own. Apple and those who make a living covering the company are both fighting a fire neither can put out without the other, regardless of what caused Apple’s rush to market whatever Apple Intelligence and the new personalized Siri was supposed to be.

The money quote of this episode and this moment is from John Gruber at Daring Fireball in Something Is Rotten in the State of Cupertino.
The fiasco is that Apple pitched a story that wasn’t true, one that some people within the company surely understood wasn’t true, and they set a course based on that.
You could say it starts and stops there. You wouldn’t be wrong.
Here’s a quote for Lance Ulanoff on TechRadar:
WWDC 2024 changed all that and gave me hope that Apple was in the AI race, but there were worrisome signs even back then that because, well, it was Apple, I chose to ignore or forgive.
Om Malk says:
It’s clear Apple must radically rethink its reason for being.
The heat on Apple has been smoldering for some time now with smoke in the air, wafting on a number of fronts. While I’m not pointing fingers and criticizing Apple pundits directly, (they were misled in my view), they’ve carried a lot of water for Apple, keeping these other recent flare-ups from burning too hot.
I’ve written about this Apple Intelligence episode previously, but to recap the particulars: Apple announced its flavor of Artificial Intelligence at last year’s World Wide Developers Conference (WWDC), carving out a fire line to slow down the burning narrative that it was behind and possibly missing the moment with AI. Boldly branding it as Apple Intelligence, the key reveal was unveiling a more personalized Siri, that unlike all of the other AI efforts on the market, would give users “AI For The Rest Of Us,” that would retain the firewall of Apple’s marketing mantra of being more secure and private.
Turns out it was a reveal that wasn’t really a reveal, but has now proven all too revealing.
As has been typical with new operating system features the last few years, Apple was clear at WWDC that some of this newness would roll out over the course of the year, so there was no surprise there. Also typical since COVID is that Apple’s announcement was a canned commercial.
Atypical, however, none of the flashier features were ever shown to pundits and journalists, even under cover of an NDA. As Gruber and others are now saying, that smoky smell reeks of vaporware.
Each year Apple faces some degree of heat as it heads into WWDC. I think things will be hotter than most this year with a higher degree of skepticism. What we’re witnessing is a landscape built by years of trust, earning the benefit of doubt, turned to ashes. They say that hell has no fury like a woman scorned, but I’m here to tell you that might take second place when it comes to torching the trust relationship between a company’s PR reps and those who cover them.
Let’s talk about that trust.
Back in my gadget blogging days for GottaBeMobile.com the first rule of thumb was always be skeptical of PR. I’ve been on both sides of that fence, pushing out PR for my own projects and covering it for others. A PR pro tells you the story they want you to cover. Covering that story, you look for the holes in addition to covering it. By and large most of the well know Apple pundits have done a reasonably good job of revealing those holes in my opinion.
Apple was different in that for the most part if they made a claim it usually held up. I remember distinctly when the first iPad was released with a claimed battery life of 10 hours. Those of us at GBM were surprised when those claims proved accurate once we had the devices in our hands. Promise made. Promise fulfilled. Trust earned.
No company is perfect, certainly not Apple. But Apple has been reasonably consistent for most of the time I’ve been covering or using their hardware and software. There have been lapses — Siri being a prime example — but nothing that wasn’t overcome and perhaps, now in retrospect, wrongly overlooked because of the trust Apple built with the media and enthusiasts who covered the company. As most now realize, the smoke and mirror show of last year’s WWDC Apple Intelligence announcement was a red flag warning that needed more scrutiny than relying on trust banked through good will and follow through.
It’s currently being endlessly debated whether or not this failure was caused by a rush to satisfy Wall Street deep in its AI bubble, poor leadership, or just trying to climb too high a mountain too fast in an attempt to create a technical solution that, as announced, would one up those already on the market. In the end I don’t think it matters much what exactly sparked this blaze. I do think it matters how Apple chooses to put out the fire. Those who cover Apple, and more importantly users, feel scorched. I’m guessing there are some in Cupertino feeling that as well.
Burn scars don’t heal well or quickly.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above.


