Apple Tugs at the HeartStrings with New Commercial

Clever and touching ad from Apple deserves a listen.

Apple hasn’t had the best of luck with commercials this year, but they pushed out one that carries an emotional punch heading into the holidays. Called HeartStrings it highlights new hearing health features users with AirPods Pro 2 can take advantage of to use them as hearing aids.

Users can run a hearing test that according to Apple provides “scientifically validated results within minutes and the ability to activate a clinical-grade Hearing Aid Feature on your AirPods Pro 2.” I took the test and my hearing rated just fine, but if you’d like to read how one user tested this out, I recommend checking out What It’s Like to Hear Better with AirPods Pro 2 by John Voorhees on MacStories. 

The commercial certainly belongs in the warm and fuzzy holiday genre and in my opinion is quite well done. It certainly is a better approach than crushing up some musical instruments.

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. 

Happy Thanksgiving!

Happy Thanksgiving to those who celebrate the holiday.

Thanksgiving Dog and Cat Use.

May you find joy, comfort, laughter and love in the company of family and friends today. May your football team not embarrass you, and may your cup be full. Eat, drink, be merry, and give thanks for your blessings. My hunch is these holidays will too soon feel different going forward.

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. 

A Nice Thanksgiving Day Tonic for Football Fans: ‘It’s In The Game’ Madden NFL

Fun behind the scenes look at the creation if the popular Madden NFL video game.

Football is, for better or worse, a Thanksgiving Day ritual. There’s always a game playing from morning until night. Before, during, and after meals. Before, during, and after naps. Sometimes the stakes don’t matter. Sometimes they do. It’s may not be the main course, but it’s that side-dish that’s shows up every Thanksgiving-loved by some, despised by some, but always a tradition.

If you’re unlucky enough to follow some of the teams playing this year, (Chicago Bears, NY Giants, Dallas Cowboys) who have put up dismal records so far, and you still need a football fix, It’s In The Game, Madden NFL might be a satisfactory substitute instead of watching the games those teams are scheduled to play. I’m not saying those games will suck, but chances are they’ll be background noise even before the tryptophan, the booze, or the gummies start to kick in

It’s In The Game Madden NFL  is currently streaming on Amazon Prime and the four episodes chronicle some of the victories and defeats behind the long running and popular Madden NFL video game franchise. If you’re a fan of the sport, the video game, or just a gamer in general, it’s fascinating backstage viewing, though not the best produced documentary I’ve seen. I haven’t played the game since the 90’s, but I’ve watched cousins, nephews, and a bevy of friends love it and play it far into adulthood. 

So, if you’re a football fan looking for a tonic that’s not really a palette cleanser you might want to check it out. The trailer is linked below.

 

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. 

Avoiding Thanksgiving Political Squabbles

A preemptive attempt at avoiding holiday harangues over politics.

Thanksgiving kicks off the end of year holiday season. Time to gather with family and friends and give thanks for our blessings. Time to get tied up in traffic or airports. Deal with weather delays. Pass illnesses around like we pass the potatoes, (hopefully not COVID), and either argue over our political differences or sit around the fire pretending that those chasms don’t exist. 

Shutterstock 2372790555.

Yeah, it’s a time for anxiety and has been for almost a decade now. So much so that it has become a political cliché and a sad shortcut for what we’re all living through. Certainly there’s joy to be found in the warmth and good company of family and friends, but in my life those circles are smaller than they used to be. 

In the early years of the first Trump administration I didn’t initially shy away from arguing politics at family gatherings. It was largely a fruitless endeavor. We knew less then than we do now. After a few bouts of that my wife and I agreed that we’d just keep our opinions to ourselves going forward to avoid the aggravation.  We largely did, even in the face of being baited now again by Trump worshipping, Fox loving sycophants.

We’ve largely tried to adhere to that avoidance game in the wake of this year’s calamitous election. We’ve actually turned down an invitation or two and will probably do so again in the future. While we’ll avoid conflict and aggravation when we can, I’ve made it plain in our house that I won’t hold my tongue going forward if someone tosses out the bait. 

This Thanksgiving we’re fortunate in that we’re going to a small celebration with family and friends who view the world much the way we do, so that should be anxiety free. This scheduling has nothing to do with the political situation and we’re thankful for that. But we know there will be other invitations forthcoming during the next month or so. 

With that in mind I’ve developed my response in case those show up. Here it is:

Thanks for the invitation. We’d love to attend. Before we accept there a few things I want to make clear. We know we disagree on politics, and while we’ve largely avoided that topic at past gatherings, it is important for you to know that I feel I can no longer avoid doing so. Preemptively, I am sharing some feelings and beliefs important to me. 

You may not believe it, but I feel we’re heading into a dangerous and difficult time that will see much of how we’ve both viewed the world come to a crashing end. I could go on and on about Donald Trump’s lack of character and disastrous policies, and the ignorance of those who elected him, but in the interest of brevity I’ll boil all of that down to the single, simplest reason why I don’t want to spend time with you pretending. 

Donald Trump, among many things, is a rapist and a misogynist. He’s attempting to surround himself with others just like him, proving to me, and the world, just how insignificant and dispensable he thinks women are. Rape is a violent act, and shows tremendous disregard for every human being. If someone thinks rape can be overlooked, there’s not much else that they won’t do to hurt other human beings. 

In my opinion, it’s beyond disqualifying someone from office and participation in society.  Further, anyone who voted for him can’t overlook the fact that they are comfortable viewing rape and misogyny as acceptable as well. There are no trade-offs for some other policy or viewpoint that excuses that type of behavior. 

I won’t argue the point with you. To me, it’s not debatable. I also have no respect for anyone might try and change my opinion on the matter. 

I’m not asking you to change your views, they are already apparent and yours to own. But I believe it is important for you to have no doubt about mine.

Happy Holidays

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. 

Social Media Stewing in the Stewpot

Social media, like everything else, is in a state of flux.

Social Media is having another moment. Social Media has many of those. This one is in the wake of the historic U.S. election and a largely a delayed reaction to Elon Musk’s raping of what used to be Twitter, pro-Trump propagandizing, and general infantile behavior. That last comment was not intended to insult infants. They know no better.

Shutterstock 2454780715.

Certainly it cuts deeper than that. But not by too much. Since Musk’s takeover of Twitter it has largely become a stinkier cesspool than it already was pre-Musk. Now, it’s overrun by frat boys, tech bros, and Nazis, all far too eager to rape and pillage as Twitter/X barrels down a path to becoming State Sponsored Social Media. That would be ironic if irony applied to anything on the Internet and in politics these days.

Since the takeover, there have been at least three massive migrations of Twitter/X refugees that would make a human trafficker lust with envy for the business. The first came in the days leading up to and after Musk’s takeover. Most of those folks headed to Mastodon at the time. But, for quite a few Mastodon offered too many hurdles, too much policing, and too little inclusiveness to overcome their quest for Social Media solace. But quite a few stuck.

Then there was Threads, the Mark Zuckerberg empire’s attempt to swipe back at Musk. That too pulled in a rush of users, at least initially because you could import your entire Instagram graph. That could and should have been an early warning sign.

What was funny to watch in that migration was how conveniently many who had been pounding Zuckerberg as an Internet devil in the Meta hellscape, quickly developed amnesia and jumped on board. But Threads began to lose luster, when it became apparent that producing, sharing, and viewing desired content (most of it political and news) became secondary to Meta’s commercial needs. Again, that should not have been a surprise.

And in this latest chapter there is yet another shift to yet another social network, this time BlueSky.

This last migration to bluer skies is both yet another reaction against Twiiter/X and also the increasing dissatisfaction with Threads. There are reports that Mastodon is also seeing a smaller wave of newcomers or returnees. Regardless of platform, returnees is a key. When a new service, in this case a social network, is launched, there are quite a few who sign up simply to reserve their name or handle on that service, assuming that at some point their followers will, well… follow them there. Some try it out and stick, some move on, perhaps to return at a later date.

To be clear, I’m on Mastodon, Threads, and Bluesky. (Yes, those are links to my profiles on each of those services.) I stopped participating on Twitter during the first big migration, though I kept my account active for a period of time before finally deactivating it. I am one of those who will grab my name, (I always use my real name), when a new platform debuts and it is littered around more Internet services than I can remember.

If I had to choose one social media platform today I’d choose Mastodon. I’m comfortable there, and that will probably be my downfall. So I continue to actively explore because I don’t think there’s anyway to predict how any of this will evolve. Ask anyone who proudly proclaimed with each new app that they were replacing the Twitter icon on their home screen with Mastodon, then Threads, now Bluesky. Always a good laugh. Infatuations are always infinite entertainment.

Know this. For one reason or the other all of these services will end up disappointing users at some point in the future.

Here’s the thing. The story we’re living through has been repeated many times on Internet platforms other than social media and in social spheres other than the Internet. Folks find an app or a service they like. The business of that app or service changes hands when the original owners cash out (nothing wrong with that), or choose to pivot in different directions. Customers show their dissatisfaction and move on. Nothing is forever in life. The distance between now and forever is even shorter in Internet time.

Why is social media so attractive an addiction?

Being on social media is largely a performative gesture. If you’re going to participate, as opposed to just lurking and following, you’re choosing to share what you think or feel, in and of itself, quite a bit like performing. Some do it as themselves, some adopt personas.

If you rub digital elbows with celebrities, sports heroes, and other favorites, you get to bask in their spotlight while pretending that you are actually communicating with those larger than life folks with large followings. Think of it has having a backstage pass. You’re part of the entourage, part of the show. At least in your mind. And like all performers that’s where the juice is juiciest. In the little theatre or grand stages of their own minds.

But, the minute you step on any stage you also open yourself up, and become vulnerable to judgment, criticism, and yes, ridicule and possible abuse. Willing to share, many recoil at the responses that can come flying back their way, yet some thrive and build lucrative lifestyles from it. To say you need a thick skin and not care oversimplifies and understates the paradox. Protestations aside, (“I don’t read reviews”), all performers care. Even stating you don’t care is an act that shows how much you actually care.

Reacting to Reactions

Everyone wants whatever new social network pond they are swimming in to be either what TwitterX was before Musk, or anti-what TwitterX became. Everyone also wants their pond to be just the right temperature and free from scum. Except of course the scum. There will always be scum no matter how many ways of blocking or muting a network can provide.

Variety may be the spice of life, but there’s also a healthy clamoring for all of these new networks to work together. Protocol debates are heating up and some interesting solutions for cross pollination are buzzing about. Quite honestly I hope whatever we end up with will be something different with distinctions with differences among them.

I don’t expect any of these social networks will find ways to escape, or be free from whatever you, I, or someone might consider bad or wrong behavior. You would have to get rid of humans to do that. (Maybe we’re heading that way faster than we think. *Cough* AI *Cough*). There are new features in all of these newer networks that are reactions to how things sunk so low on Twitter/X. Call them reactions.  Every action may have an equal and opposite reaction, but that’s a  cycle that never ends.

Why we should have an expectation of a safe and conflict free “social” network when we live in an age when we can’t expect that at a sporting event, a church, or a family holiday gathering is beyond me. I’ve always viewed social media no differently than I view any other social interaction, there’s just a safer illusion of freedom when you’re behind a keyboard and not face to face. Remember, TwitterX had its bad actors even when it was in its prime.

Real Time

Bad actors notwithstanding, there will never be another Twitter/X-like social network that resembles what it was in that heyday. Those days and that utility are gone. In my feeds I could get real-time local news, as well as real-time news from around the planet. I could communicate with companies I did business with, promote my own, and receive technical support, (remember ComcastCares and Frank Eliason?) There was also great fun to be had reacting online in real-time to sporting or current events.

The key to all of that was the real-time or near real-time utility of Twitter. Currently none of the newer networks comes close to that. I doubt they ever will.

Bluesky looks like it might have the best chance of achieving some semblance of that real-time utility, but it’s early and it has a ways to go before any determination can be made. What is obvious is that Bluesky has put up enough of a threat to Threads, which seems to have no interest in anything approaching real time, that Meta is making rapid changes signaling they are feeling the pressure. All that means is we’re going to see some bursts of activity and change as competition, perceived or real, heats up. In real time.

What was Twitter/X wasn’t built in a day and just like everything else happening in the world we’re in a period of transition without knowing, but perhaps fearing, what we’re transitioning to. So, it is wise to be skeptical.

Far be it from me to tell anyone where to consume  or perform on social media. I’ll continue to explore what’s out there, because one way or another we’re heading somewhere different, perhaps faster than we could have imagined a short time ago.

Pick your poison.

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. 

Robert LePage’s Hamlet without Words, Words, Words

Told through dance, LePage’s Hamlet is a thrill.

What a treat. Last night a group of us celebrated a friend’s birthday by attending the Robert LePage production of Hamlet. Billed as a Hamlet without words Le LePage collaborated with choreographer Guillaume Côté, who also danced the title role, to deliver a piece almost entirely as a ballet performed by a company of nine. It was an exquisite theatrical adventure. 

Hamlet 4 photo by Stephane Bourgeois.

With the exception of a few supertitles announcing character entrances for identification, the story unfolds and unfurls through dance, and Côté’s choreography was excellent throughout. Although, I felt the vocabulary he established for himself in the title role was not as strong or consistently surprising as it was for the rest of the ensemble. In and of itself surprising, because the entire story revolves around Hamlet’s surprising reactions to the events enfolding him. 

The true standout in the company was Carleen Zouboules as Ophelia. Her descent into madness, her drowning, and the graveyard scene were the highlights among many in the production. The entire ensemble were excellent and each had standout moments of their own.

LePage always surprises and Chicago audience were lucky to have this US premiere here. Thrilled I got to see it. There’s a trailer linked below, although it seems to have a larger ensemble than the nine person version we saw last night.

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. 

 

Sunday Morning Reading

Delusions abound in this week’s Sunday Morning Reading.

If it’s Sunday, it is time for Sunday Morning Reading with interesting writing on a variety of topics, that without intending to all seem to involve delusions in one way or another. There’s also a little Procol Harum on the side. Enjoy reading, while you skip the light fandango.

Speaking of delusions, check out a piece by Michael Connors and Peter Halligan exploring What Delusions Can Tell Us About the Cognitive Nature of Belief. 

It’s no delusion that Artificial Intelligence remains in the news (before it eventually subsumes the news). Harry McCracken takes us a bit into the deep mind behind Google’s DeepMind in The Future According to Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis. That first link takes you to the web version, this one takes you to the Apple News version of the article since the piece is a premium article for Fast Company readers.

Joan Westenberg has caught my eye of late (if you follow Sunday Morning Reading you should know that) and here are a couple of recently published dynamic pieces: Don’t Confuse Volume with Truth and Rebel Optimism: How We Thrive in a Broken World. Both worth your time.

We’re all complaining about a lot of things, the continued enshittification of the Internet being a familiar and well deserved  target. (It’s interesting that I use that term enshittification so frequently and yet spell check or any other type of check hasn’t picked it up yet.) Dave Winer is fighting the good fight on a lot of fronts and he looks at a new kind of enshittification in Billionaire-proof?

David Todd McCarty takes on the platitude “the meek shall inherit the earth” in The Children of Pacifists.

Ronan Farrow takes a look at The Technology The Trump Administration Could Use To Hack Your Phone. You know it’s going to happen. You know it most likely already has.

And to round things out this week, Ulf Wolf spools out an essay on the mostly forgotten Keith Reid of Procol Harum in The Shadow Member of Procol Harum. Not going to lie, I did spin up a copy of Whiter Shade of Pale while writing this week’s column. The Salty Dog album is cued up next.

If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here.  You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. You can also find me on social networks, including Bluesky, under my own name.

Check Out Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy

Worth a watch even without many surprises.

Here is the U.S we’re heading into the Thanksgiving holiday, already surrounded by the madness of Black Friday, coupled with anxiety brought about by the recent election. It feels like everyday has been Black Friday under dark cloudy political skies for too long already, and of course that will continue straight into Christmas and beyond. 

 Here’s a thought. If you gather with friends and family this Thanksgiving, instead of watching football or squabbling over politics, tune everybody into the Netflix documentary Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy. The trailer is embedded above.

This somewhat entertaining documentary (it’s presentation conceit feels a bit too cutesy for my tastes), tackles the problems of rampant consumerism through a prism of what happens to all the stuff we buy this Black Friday, those previous, those to come, and any other day of the year.

The highlights of the series are the short cut interviews with former employees of Amazon, Adidas, Apple, folks from the fashion industry, and activists who are trying to address the issues of the large amount of waste created with all of our purchasing power.

If you’ve even remotely been paying attention to the world, there won’t be any grand surprises about the large amounts of unrecyclable waste we’re swimming in and adding to. That said, hearing some of the folks who feel responsible for their own decisions that led their company down that path of excess discuss their shifts in thinking makes the piece worthwhile.

There also aren’t any real surprises in the way the documentary lays out the tricks of the marketing trade to convince us to buy more stuff. Addressing the issue through a perspective of saying we could all buy less certainly makes sense, but given we all know that the game is rigged no differently than carnival games are, it makes one wonder why we do keep coming back each time the circus tents get pitched. 

Style points and lack of surprises aside, Buy Now! The Shopping Conspiracy is worth viewing, especially I would think if you have younger ones in your holiday household who might still be impressionable.

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. 

Sound and Fury with Apple TV Enhance Dialogue

Apple TV’s Enhance Dialogue works well until it doesn’t.

Apple introduced a feature I was very much looking forward to trying out this fall for tvOS 18. It’s called Enhance Dialogue. The theory behind the feature is simple: enhance the dialogue of what you’re watching so you can hear it. When my wife and I initially tested it we were quite pleased with the feature. But last night there was some weirdness.

Like so many features Apple (and others) release, new things seem to work out of the box. But then as updates rollout and things burn in, a bit of oddness creeps in.

Last night we were watching the finale of the Apple TV+ series Disclaimer. Things were rolling along just fine and then towards the end of the episode we stopped hearing dialogue. Characters became silent film stars and mimes with moving mouths, but no sound of dialogue was coming out. Underscoring continued.

Initially we thought this might be an artistic choice (a poor one.) What was happening in the story as it headed to its conclusion and then denouement could reasonably be understood without dialogue. But a tertiary character behind a nurse’s station uttered one line of dialogue, breaking the silence, and then immediately we went back to a silent film again.

I shouldn’t say completely silent. Background noises and conversations from background characters were coming through as ambience over the underscoring. Then a few moments later we heard some of the dialogue, but it was muffled and echo-y as though picked up by a distant microphone or layered on top in post of what we were supposed to be hearing. Every now and then we’d occasionally get those clear, one line bursts of dialogue. The conclusion I reached after this whole thing was over is that those lines in the clear must have been overdubbed and the muffled lines were due to be enhanced later.

We paused the episode and I turned on subtitles, revealing that there was indeed dialogue being spoken. We stopped the episode and tried again. Same result. I then went back to settings and turned off Enhance Dialogue. Voila. We were able to hear all the dialogue again.

I know lots of things are going on in the backend at Apple has they continue to roll out betas at a crazy pace trying to play catch up in the Artificial Intelligence game. I’ve written before on how this can have an effect on even non-beta users. What’s puzzling to me is that this doesn’t seem like a feature that should be affected by backend services. Perhaps I’m wrong. But we’ve watched several shows without this issue since first turning on Enhance Dialogue.

Here’s the thing. In my opinion, both the visual and audio elements of film making have pushed new technology envelopes a bit too far. We shouldn’t need a feature to enhance dialogue to overcome bad sound mixes that try to be as realistic, or unrealistic, as possible in the same way that we should still be able to view actors in dark scene. If you can’t see or hear the story, what’s the point of the story, or the technology? Sound and fury signifying not much.

Then again, I get it. Artists will tell you they are trying to make things look and sound as real as possible, or craft an environment that is all encompassing with all of the elements at their disposal. Too often they get carried away and lose us to ineffective story telling.

I had planned to write up a blog post saying how much the Enhance Dialogue feature was a winner after some success with the new feature. I can’t say for sure that there is direct causation between the new Enhance Dialogue feature and the dialogue dropout we experienced. I will say, that it’s easy to point a finger of correlation after new features are released and something, anything goes awry. For now, I’ll leave it as the Enhance Dialogue feature looks like it could possibly be a winner in our household. If it works as advertised. All the time. Every time.

I will also say again that if filmmakers did their jobs correctly this wouldn’t be necessary except for those watching who might need assistive technology. In my opinion, if story tellers start relying on this feature to be present (I know it exists on many smart TVs,) it will be to the detriment of their craft and artistry.

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. 

A Dream Cast Delivers a Dreamy Dream of Autumn by Jon Fosse

Exceptional performances highlight a magical evening with a magical play.

Fantastic! That’s the first, but not the last compliment I’ll issue to the remarkable cast of our staged reading of Jon Fosse’s play Dream of Autumn last night. Matt Keely, Thomasin Savaiano, Gabrielle Brite, Amy Stricker, and Kevin Grubb were each, and as an ensemble, gloriously fantastic. They deserve all the praise that came flying their way after the reading. Producers should hire them.

Dream of Autumn was presented as a part of this year’s International Voices Project festival. Each piece is given a one-night only reading after a limited rehearsal period (more on that later).

For those unfamiliar, the actors read from their scripts, but are expected to bring full life to the text. This group sure did. Dream is a tricky play, dwelling in the realm of magical realism, with time shifts, and in this story character shifts, that can turn on the edge of dime. In a full production there would be production elements to help the audience follow those shifts. In this very barebones reading style, with the actors sitting in chairs and reading from their scripts from behind music stands, those shifts were handled via the reading of stage directions and the acting choices made by each member of the cast. According to the audience during our post-performance talk back, every one followed each twist and turn.

We only had about six hours of rehearsal to prepare, and the cast took the direction that was given and ran with it, culminating in a very “in the moment” experience for themselves as well as the audience. This was the first time this cast had read the play start to finish, together, without stopping. It was also the first time I had heard it. You could feel the entire room caught in the moments of the play and the moments of performance, breathing as one.

Having directed a number of these staged readings I’ve seen similar quite a few times, but rarely as well and as thrilling as last night’s effort. I often maintain that one of the true tests of an actor’s mettle is watching them carry the day with little preparation, trusting their skill and instincts. This team certainly carried this play last night further than most.

My hat’s off to each of them. Job exceptionally well done.

All photos by Scott Dray.

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome. I can also be found on social media under my name as above. Check out the categories for this blog to read more about my theatre work.