Musings on life, the theatre, technology, culture and the occasional emu sighting
Author: Warner Crocker
I stumble through life as a theatre director and playwright as well as a gadget geek...commenting along the way. Every day I learn something new is a good day, so I share what I find exciting, new, stupid and often worthwhile.
As if we all don’t have enough to keep up with, the news generated quite a bit of buzz. No word on if it generated actual pre-orders.
Well, for those thinking about joining the Commodore 64 nostalgia parade, there might be some legal hurdles on the parade route ahead.
Commodore Industries, S.r.l, is out with a press release claiming they still own what’s own-able regarding the Commodore 64 and offering documents and evidence. After all of the hype surrounding Simpson’s announcement Commodore Industries claims it is now time to “intervene” to set the record straight.
Quoting from the press release:
Mr. Christian Simpson (alias ‘Peri Fractic’) recently made statements on his YouTube channel, at different times, which were picked up by numerous media outlets and various newspapers, aimed at undermining our position, claiming to have ‘bought Commodore’ and describing our use of the trademark as ‘illegitimate’.
None of the initiatives launched in the United States give Mr Simpson the right and/or power to cancel or revoke our legitimate rights to the above trademarks.
Such claims are not only legally unfounded, but also compromise the truth and unjustifiably discredit a business project that has invested time, resources and expertise in relaunching the Commodore brand in a modern and technologically advanced way.
In closing the press release states:
Our goal remains the same: to continue to create real value for the brand and for the entire Commodore ecosystem. For this reason, we are ready to dialogue and collaborate with anyone who demonstrates, through their actions, a constructive spirit and respect for both the rules and the community.
#WeAreCommodore
The hashtag and bold typeface concluded the press release.
Sounds like some lawyers are going to make some money. No one ever gets nostalgic over that happening.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
Continuing to watch Apple’s Betas from the sidelines.
Apple’s adventures with its new Liquid Glass design language reminds me of the title of a terrific, yet gloomy, Ingmar Bergman film, Through a Glass Darkly. Keep in mind that I’m not running the beta and living vicariously through the reactions of those whose opinions I trust. That said, based on some of those opinions of the recently released 4th developer beta, the future of Apple’s new design approach appears less than clear.
From most accounts it’s a battle between legibility and the “coolness” of the design’s featured transparency that overlays content with the intent for the content below to bleed through. The challenge seems to be finding the right amount of bleed through that also allows users to easily read a notification or a control.
In my view, the challenge with that challenge seems to be one of fighting things you can’t control. Holding liquid in your bare hands without spilling a drop might be easier. Every website and app designer has their own preference and approach. Even Apple apparently has difficulty as some of their own apps with background bleed through obscuring text.
Since Apple announced Liquid Glass there have been three iterations of the approach. In a sort of Goldilocks and the Three Bears adventure with Apple dialing transparency features back and forth. Now in the 4th version of the developer beta reengaging more transparency. Searching for a “just right” solution doesn’t yet seem to be yielding any clear direction. But then, Apple’s ambitions, perhaps by design, have created a lose-lose short term future. The eventual product will never please everyone with this design change. But to be fair, that’s always the case with design changes and the folks at Apple knew that going in.
There are other usability issues as well, including things like making it easy to tell which tab or control is in focus, and having to tap multiple times to perform a function that used to be one tap to name a couple I see repeatedly mentioned.
But the clear focus of complaints (and some praise) is Liquid Glass. I would venture that for users it’s still too early to judge, but supposedly the Public Beta is due soon and the consensus is that what we see there will be pretty close to what we see in the Fall. Developers on the other hand are increasingly worried about Apple’s search for a “just right” solution while they try to find a path forward to have their own apps ready for the big release alongside or close to the release of this new wave of operating systems.
The problem becomes magnified when designing for the lowest common denominator with so many users. From my perspective of supporting clients and family members, most folks just want to pick up their devices and do what they want or need to do. They don’t want a new learning curve getting in the way. They certainly don’t want legibility issues to get in the way. There’s a real tension between what Apple needs to do to keep the cash registers ringing and the familiarity users want that I don’t think the folks in Cupertino understand given the annual pace they seem locked into.
From where I sit on the sidelines, I think Apple has also created some real and perhaps less transparent problems beyond how Liquid Glass eventually rolls out.
Coming on the heels, and at least somewhat intended as a distraction from last year’s Apple Intelligence and Siri woes, Apple needs to create a clear narrative surrounding Liquid Glass in order to sell this year’s new crop of iPhones. (I imagine the commercials have already been scripted if not filmed.)
That already seemed like quite a challenge given that the only big hardware news this year is the rumored introduction of a smaller, lighter, apparently with less features iPhone Air. I don’t imagine that Apple’s traditional iPhone lineup is going to have new features to tout that makes those familiar device form factors must haves or must upgrades.
If you’re counting on a flashy UI design change as the distraction that gets criticized as much as the issue you’re trying to distract from you’re magnifying your problems. Unless of course, you bank on criticism of the distraction further distracting from bigger issues.
Adding to that, the larger narrative has somewhat already passed by this year’s iPhones to what comes next year, with just about everyone assuming Apple’s version of folding iPhones will be the new focus.
Sum all of that up and this is starting to feel potentially like a lost year for Apple. Sure, Apple will sell lots of iPhones, but if it can’t capture the imagination the way Apple usually does, much of the narrative will be wait ’til next year. Apple historically takes a long view. Time will tell if they have lost control of the visible horizon.
iPadOS 26
That said, somewhat under the radar, iPad beta users continue to trumpet the success of changes made in iPadOS 26. I’m looking forward to seeing that myself. That said, as much as those potential changes will be welcome, I can’t imagine that’s the tentpole Apple wants to rely on to create excitement this year.
I mentioned the film Through A Glass Darkly in the opening of this post. The story of that classic film is about a family that gathers to try and heal after a member diagnosed with schizophrenia is released from an asylum. If you ask me, the challenges we’re seeing at Apple with design changes, Apple Intelligence and Siri among other things demonstrate that there are multiple personalities exhibiting control at various times within Apple, at a time when some turnover at the top is already underway, with quite a few calling for more.
As always, I recommend Michael Tsai’s Blog as a good source to keep track of how all of this continues to develop.
And with that, I’ll leave this update from the sidelines with this.
Update: The public betas for all of Apple’s new operating systems were released shortly after this post was originally published.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
Just a quick link to this piece from Alexandra Petri that had me laughing called Are You Laughing Yet? She also had me angry, but then that’s my state of things these days. I laughed because the writing and commentary is excellent. I got angry, because, well if you’re not angry at what’s going on these days, you’re either dead, or… well, I’ll just leave it at that.
Petri has a blisteringly funny take that begins with Trump’s takedown shakedown of Stephen Colbert via his pressure on Paramount. But it quickly spins into a larger take that’s well worth your while, especially if you enjoy comedy.
Well worth your time. Scroll back up and click the link.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
I once wrote a line in a play that I cribbed from my mother that always got applause, “Just because it’s legal, don’t make it right.” I’d like to assume that most folks who might read a thing or two here understand that far too many laws have been written not to protect everyone or make things right, but instead to often give cover for blatant acts against the little guy in favor of the big guns.
Copyright laws when used as a weapon to further corporate interests and feather CEO nests have been one of the favorite tools for the bad guys. That’s been an ever increasing problem paralleling the advance of technology as more and more companies reject the idea that if you bought it you own it, and still claim rights that too often are protected by laws that were never written to contemplate the world we find ourselves in.
With a hat tip to Denny Henke, take a look at this video from Louis Rossmann about a recent example of this.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
With aging comes awareness. Or at least it should.
We’re on Lake Time this weekend, but there’s still time to share some Sunday Morning Reading.
Two weeks ago I shared a piece from youngster David Todd McCarty titled When I Was Old. I’m resharing it this week since I celebrated a birthday on Friday, getting one year closer to marking seven decades on this rock. Also sharing another great piece from David, called I Was Told There’d Be More.
I’ve been an Elmore Leonard fan for as long as I can remember. Anthony Lane’sElmore Leonard’s Perfect Pitch may not be perfect, but it is damned close enough.
You might notice a touch of sentimentality and reminiscing in the pieces above. Comes with the thoughts during a birthday weekend. Fair warning though that most of the links shared below are a bit darker, and yes, more political than those above. With aging comes awareness. Or at least it should.
Mike Masnick’s piece Facism for First Time Founders offers the next generation a clue or two, assuming the current generation doesn’t crash it all before they get a chance to discover them.
I’ve written about the concept of enshittification in tech quite a bit. Mostly as regards the Internet. Henry Farrell and Abraham L. Newman take a look at The Enshittifcation of American Power.
Another big contributor to enshittification is the media who increasingly seem more and more clueless and devoid of any self awareness. Charlotte Kim takes a look Inside The Media’s Traffic Apocalypse.
To conclude this week I’m sharing a film review by Sonny Bunch. This one of the new film Eddington. I haven’t seen the film. I plan to. Rarely does a review encourage or discourage me from seeing a film. If it’s anything like Bunch describes one way or the other I’m sure it will be worth it as it sounds like a fun, yet conflicted, summary of lots of things we’ve all been living through since 2020, and continue to do so. I’ll leave it with this quote:
The feed never stops, the algorithm never tires. There’s always more. It never ends. Just a few more videos. You can sleep later. You can never sleep, if that’s what you’d prefer. Who knows what you’ll miss when you’re asleep?
And we wonder why everyone has gone a little nuts.
If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Readinghere. If you’d like more click on the Sunday Morning Reading link in the category column to check out what’s been shared on Sunday’s past. You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.
I wish we heard more like this from our musical artists. Sheryl Crow doesn’t shy away when it comes to letting her political feelings out. In her latest song ‘The New Normal’ she certainly lets her voice be heard.
“Is it science fiction or prediction wrapped in George Orwell?” If the news is fake and fear is hate and nothing’s immoral to the leader of the free world, then welcome to the new normal,” goes the refrain.
I certainly don’t want to think of any of this as normal, new or otherwise. But I like the song and the motivation behind it.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
Scott Hanselman is a someone I’ve followed for quite some time. I’ve always found his insights on technology and the intersection technology has with humanity to be valuable and that they make me think. Strange that I think of it has an intersection, given that technology wouldn’t exist without humans.
Scott breaks down the three promises of technology into Connection, Convenience, and Creativity. I won’t hint at where the talk goes, you should watch it for yourself.
As an intriguing side note given the subject matter I found in remarkably inconvenient that WordPress decided to do some sort of work on their backend as I went to publish this post. Technology is great when it delivers, right?
Regardless, what Scott has to share is excellent stuff and highly recommended.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.I can also be found on social media under my name as above.
The older you get, nostalgic moments can be fun, even if fleeting. If nothing else they jog a few memories to the front of your brain for a bit. When they involve bits and bytes they also help you remember just how much things have changed. One of those fun memories for me is of my first computer, The Commodore 64.
Recently, news hit that Christian ‘Peri Fractic’ Simpson, who has been trying to revive the Commodore 64 for some time now, has finally put enough of whatever he needs to start taking pre-orders for a “new” Commodore 64.
The announcement stirred a wave of nostalgia from those, like myself, who owned one of these early personal computers. And like many, those waves felt quite pleasant to surf in for a while. It also has churned up some of the rough waves from back in the day when “what computer is best” was a big part of the discussion.
I owned the Commodore 64, later moved to the Commodore 128 and then an Amiga, before eventually surrendering to the IBM PC/Windows world and later Apple. But I do indeed have fond memories of sprites dancing around on the small TV monitor I had connected to the 64, all of the peripherals I accumulated along the way, and some of the games. Archon and Lode Runner were two of my favorites, and the text adventure version of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy was my first exposure to Douglas Adams. I was also a fan of the GEOS operating system. And yes, I typed in many a computer program from computer magazines of the day, as well as quite a few words into PaperClip.
Drew Sauer has penned a nice piece on this called The Commodore 64 Made A Difference, continuing the trip down memory lane and also surfacing some of those “what computer is best” feelings, apparently not too deeply buried in some memory banks. Apple bloggers John Gruber and Jason Snell have taken issue with some of Sauer’s comments and recollections.
Frankly, it’s all in good fun, (I hope), I don’t think it matters much for those who hope Simpson can deliver on his promises, and if he does, plop down their money to relive some of those memories. Nostalgia itself also comes in waves.
I’m also sure that memories can falter, become fuzzy, and take on a life of their own. Which is something the Commodore 64 could never do, unlike what so many want their computers to do today.
You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.I can also be found on social media under my name as above.