Sunday Morning Reading

Winter is bearing down on big portions of the U.S. Some places are already digging out. I’m in one of the former portions (Memphis) that doesn’t handle it well. So today, Sunday Morning Reading will contain less links than usual. We’re rushing to get things accomplished before folks anticipate a rough time (or a snow day) in this old southern town. But don’t rush through these links.

As for winter, Zoë Schalnger has a good piece up about The Threshold at Which Snow Starts Irreversibly Disappearing.  Given deadlines and what’s impending here I sort of wish it never would appear, but that’s not the point of this article.

U.S. Politics may be a hot topic, but not enough to defeat Old Man Winter in Iowa where the first caucus will be held tomorrow for apparently no reason. The debate also rages on about the 14th Amendment. This piece from Jason Linkins, The Fourteenth Amendment Scolds Abetting Trump’s Return, turns up the heat on that issue and the media that keeps screwing up the coverage.

Natasha MH, talks about school reunions in The United States of Reunion. Great piece about the inner conflicts they can dredge up.

Smart is Not Always Wise. I concur. So does David Todd McCarty who penned this piece.

And for those who come here for a little tech, check out John Siracusa’s take on Artificial Intelligence entitled I Made This. Well worth your time.

If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here.  You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.

The Lehman Trilogy Diaries: Interpret or Learn?

The other night there was a moment in rehearslal for The Lehman Trilogy that caught me and stood out. The moment is in one of the more comic scenes of the play. Given what’s happening  around and to us in the world these days, the truth behind it isn’t very funny. Then again, sometimes comedy is the best mirror in which to see ourselves.

That moment goes like this:

Young Herbert Lehman is a trouble maker in school for always asking too many questions. His Rabbi asks the class to recite back to him the ten plagues God visited on Egypt. The Rabbi does everything in his power to keep from calling on the young troublemaker, choosing every boy in the class, until at last there’s only Herbert left to regurgitate the answer.

RABBI: I suppose I should hear the last plague from you Herbert Lehman.

HERBERT: HaShem let the children of Egypt die.

RABBI: That’s wrong, Lehman. HaShem did not do that.

HERBERT: Yes he did, Rabbi.

RABBI: No, he didn’t.

As usual, you want to interpret, rather than to learn.

According to the scripture: ‘At midnight HaShem slaughtered

every firstborn in the country of Egypt.’

Every Firstborn is not the same as ALL the children, Lehman.

HERBERT: Whatever it says, Rabbi.

I have a problem with HaShem’s decision.

Why massacre the children of Egypt who were innocent?

RABBI: Lehman…

HERBERT: I have a problem with all of the plagues.

RABBI: Lehman! This is intolerable!

HERBERT: In my opinion, HaShem – instead of wasting time with plagues – should have simply killed the pharaoh…

RABBI: HaShem does not take advice from Herbert Lehman!

Interpret rather than to learn” is what caught and what catches. For much of our lives, and I daresay for much of the lives of those who’ve populated the planet since humanity wiggled out of the slime we’ve been both blessed and plagued by the margins between “interpreting” and “learning.” Witness current events and how violently we seem to disagree over interpretations of things we’ve supposedly learned.

You can find more of my writings on a variety of topics on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome and check out The Lehman Trilogy Diaries here

Sunday Morning Reading

We just commemorated the anniversary of the history altering events of January 6th. So some of thse links in this weeks’ edition of Sunday Morning Reading will reflect that. Not all. But some. If that turns you off, apologies in advance. Not to you. Because of you.

Kicking it off is David Todd McCarty’s Who’s Teaching You a Lesson? Read it damnit.

Driftglass offers up The Art of Persuasion is Over. Short. Sweet. Persuasive.

David French offers up The Case of Disqualifying Trump is Strong. I agree. Too bad the judges it will be argued in front of are not.

David Graham tells us How Trump Taught America to Tolerate Brazen Corruption. We’ve always tolereated corruption. Most of us just don’t want it flaunted openly in our face by a bunch of bragadocius buffoons.

Changing the tune, check out To Own The Future, Read Shakespeare. Not what you think. It’s about tech and the liberal arts. Great read.

NatashMH wonders how the plot got lost regarding feminism in We Were Once Dragons and Phoenices. Another great read.

And then for something completely different, check out Dana Milbank’s I Killed A Deer From My Bathroom.

If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here.  You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.

Read This Damnit!

Stop what you’re doing. Go read this piece from David Todd Mccarty. I’m quoting a brief excerpt below. But go read this, damnit. 

This isn’t going to be an Arab Spring, which, by the way, didn’t work out all that well for anyone in the end. Ask the Egyptian activists how they’re doing. You want a glimpse of your future? Look to Russia. Look to Iran. You will march proudly in the streets, and at night, you will be taken from your bed, never to be seen or heard from again.

If you think that’s hyperbole. Think again, my friends.

Sunday Morning Reading

Happy Christmas Eve! Sitting here away from and missing home, waiting for the clock to run out on my COVID quarantine (so far a very mild case). Life hits. You take the punch. You move on. So moving on, here’s some Christmas Eve Sunday Morning Reading to share.

Kicking off with a couple of pieces from one of my favorite writers, David Todd McCarty. First up for those into the holiday gift giving thing he offers The Ol’ Bowling Ball Bag Gift. 

Following that with another holiday themed piece about how small moments with a family can turn into life long touchstones in We’re All Tired, Dear.

Keeping in the holiday vein, Megan Angelo gives us My Selfish Christmas Tradition—And How You Can Do It Too.

Christmas is a time for new smartphones. NatashaMH takes on what happens if you lose your new precious in A Slave to The Machine.

Stepping away from the holidays for a bit, David Pierce has an excellent piece on The Fediverse entitled 2023 in Social Media: The Case for the Fediverse.

And just to keep things real amidst the holiday hoopla, Rogé Karma takes on Private Equity, one of the several unseen dangers lurking in our midst in The Secretive Industry Devouring the U.S. Economy. 

To close out back to the holidays spotllighting an Icelandic folk tale of Jólakötturinn, The Yule Cat that eats children who don’t wear the new clothes they received on Christmas. Guess you better don those new socks tomorrow morning.

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays!

If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here.  You can also find more of my writings on Medium at this link, including in the publications Ellemeno and Rome.

A Moment Appears in Colorado

We’ve hit a moment. A moment where the fissures, already yawning open quite wide, could widen further, into a destable maw beyond anything most could possibly imagine. And it’s all due to a 4-3 decision by the Colorado Supreme Court that will quickly head to the U.S Supreme Court.

The Colorado Supremes saying “Stop” to Trump’s Republican party ballot presence have in essence called the question on and for all of us. Not just on whether he can be on the ballot and thus potentially elected. That’s certainly the immediate stakes. But there are larger stakes that are about to be exposed.

This was always headed to SCOTUS. Depending on which team you root for you probably feel frightened by that or encouraged, given the makeup of that collection of corrupt pseudo-gods in black robes that the constitution enshrines and entrusts as the last line of its own defense.

These nine, for better or worse, are about to make a decision that may just put everything that follows to rest. Or they may just punt and let it linger until the election. Either way there’s going to be chaos.

From what I can tell, (admittedly I’m a bit swamped between work, the holidays and such so I haven’t see everything,) the legal underpinnings of the Colorado court’s decsion are sound. Some even say it’s a decision engineered to make those who use “strict constructionism” as a shield and a weapon to have second thoughts about taking up those well polished and well worn arms. But others say that’s bunkum. Either way, we’re in the slight sliver of the moment when you can say whatever the hell you want because only nine voices matter.

Though the law should be the deciding factor, the stakes I’m talking cut deeper.

Assuming that those who think the decision is legally sound are correct, there is an opportunity to rid us all of this meddlesome miscreant for both his allies as well as his opponents. Set him aside and move on. Us the law to do it. It may be late term, but this is an abortion most would welcome. Although too many will pretend they don’t. Some have had the chance to do this before and let the opportunity pass (U.S. Senate) thinking he’d fade away. We all seem to know that’s not going to happen again.

This is a country that has allowed itself to be bullied and terrorized, while trying to wrap its head around the destruction of cherished concepts (free speech, democracy, etc…) searching for some way out of the mess, hoping for some sort of deus-ex-machina. There’s no way but to go through it. And there’s no savior in the wings.  Regardless of what SCOTUS decides, much of what held us together has been taken from us and tossed in the ash can of history. And here we are at another of those moments.

Should the conservative majority of the Supreme Court steer the decision to keep Trump off the ballot,  I think we’ll have the answer we’ve all suspected for too long now. Vast swaths of our country, terrified of the demographic changes inexorably coming are willing to do just about anything to propel us backwards. Something about burning down a village to save it, I guess. And if things get lit up, why not just get on with it and get it over with. That’s the fear. And it’s a real one. I hope we don’t see that. I think we will, regardless of a SCOTUS decision now or after next November’s election results.

Intriguingly, I think Trumpty Dumpty’s allies would benefit more than his opponents from a decision that keeps him off a ballot or two. What continues to masquerade as the Republican party would probably find some new life after first stumbling over the reactions to such a momentus descion. Whatever they stumbled into would probably have a better chance of beating Biden, assuming they can actually sideline the orange buffoon, which is indeed questionable. But that’s an argument for a rational world. And we don’t have one of those any longer.

My hunch is that SCOTUS will punt rather than puncture the big orange balloon.

For Want of a Comma

Commas can be troubling things. In legal proceedings, in writing, and in publishing. Apparently we’re going to have a debate over a comma in the upcoming Trump trials. 

Comma blog pic 01 1024x1024

In his book, So Help Me God, Mike Pence is quoted as saying, “You know, I don’t think I have the authority to change the outcome”. Pence has supposedly told Jack Smith’s prosecutors that the comma shouldn’t have been placed after “you know.” 

Certainly it changes the meaning. 

Smith’s indictment apparently takes Pence’s word over his published, supposedly proofread, account and removed the comma. 

I hope this will just be a sideshow. Let’s leave debates about commas to all things Oxford.

Sunday Morning Reading

It’s the Sunday after Thanksgiving here in the U.S. and also the Sunday after Black Friday which seems to have been going on since the 4th of July. To help you recover from the hustle and bustle, both behind and ahead, here’s some Sunday Morning Reading to share. There’s not a deal to be had. Just some interesting reads and good thinking.

Snowmorningreading

Kicking it off David Todd McCarty wonders just What Are We All Really Thankful For? There are times when my response would be “You got me.”

Chauncey Devega strings together a list of comments from a few pundits as they headed into Thanksgiving on the dangers they see ahead culturally and politically in Democracy’s Last Thanksgiving: Experts Imagine America in a Year if Trump Wins The 2024 Election.

Denny Henke (BeardyStarStuff) tackles the deepening political and social crisis we’re facing in this post with the looming threat of losing Democracy as we think we’ve come to know it. Here’s a quote: “It has been eroded to a thin veneer with little substance because the substance of democracy is the people. And the majority of people of the US stopped caring decades ago.” 

State of play? State of Mind? With 2023 heading to a close that means 2024 beckons and so too does another presidential election in the US. But this one seems a bit, well, let’s just call it divisive. There’s certainly tumult ahead. Some are picking up and moving to safer places. Do those exist? Timothy Noah takes a look at The Red State Brain Drain Isn’t Coming. It’s Happening Right Now. 

The bigger they are the harder they fall. But these days it just means they’re landing in a cushion of money. Douglass Rushkoff takes a look at the move fast and break things bunch in ‘We will coup whoever we want!’; The Unbearable Hubris of Musk and the Billiionaire Tech Bros. 

Speaking of broken things, what’s going on in the world of Artificial Intelligence after last week’s craziness with OpenAI and Sam Altman? No AI engine could possibly figure it out, much less a human. But Christopher Mims seems to think that ‘Acclerationists’ Come Out Ahead with Sam Altman’s Return to OpenAI. 

Apple doesn’t like to admit mistakes and makes us live with some of them far too long. *Cough* *iCloud* *Cough*. Jason Snell lays out A History of Apple’s Mistakes and Failures—and How It Hates To Fix Them.

And from the world of entertainment John Carreyrou takes a look at another episode of not admitting costly mistakes in The Strange $55 Million Saga Of A Netflix Saga You’ll Never See.

Just for fun, here’s another entertainment industry piece, Caity Weaver takes a look at the career of Flo. You know Flo. She sells insurance. But do you know the actress who plays her? Check out Everybody Knows Flo From Progressive. Who is Stephanie Courtney?

And since you’ve read all of this on some screen or the other, take a look at this piece from Scott-Ryan Abt as he wonders What Happened to the Man on the Train? Here’s quote: “Maybe there was a time when people didn’t stare at their screens, but those days are forgotten. Maybe there was a time when you’d have a shared human experience on a train, at an airport, at a coffee shop, or on the street. Screens have changed that.”

If you’re interested in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here. 

Thermonuclear It Ain’t. But Musk’s Lawsuit is More Than a Sneak Preview of What’s to Come

Another failed launch. Elon Musk continues mucking up all things that used to be Twitter and most anything else he casts his gaze on. After ripping off his thinly veiled disguise as a free speech advocate, he’s now enlisting fellow right wing crazies in his “thermonuclear” legal response to advertisers suspending or pausing their ad spends on the cesspit that remains of what Twitter once was before he X’d it into a bad SNL parody.

6J4GYQW5INPTPD4OZYP3JY52EE

Thermonuclear it ain’t. As TechCrunch writer Devin Coldewey points out the defmation lawsuit actually confirms that the legal filing actually turns in on itself and reveals the behavior it is supposedly being defamed for. It would be entertaining if not for the fact that it reveals exactly where we’re headed politically.

Texas’ criminal-in-chief, Attorney General Ken Paxton, is once again leading the charge. You might remember him for his many legal screwups, cheating on his wife, trying to declare elections in other states as illegal, and how he managed to recently avoid impeachment. But he’s just a player with plays to make if Donald Trump somehow manages to get re-elected. Paxton proves that those like him, Trump, and Musk can’t wait to use whatever mechanisms of government they don’t dismantle to screw the rest of us over.

This is supposedly a battle over Free Speech. But that’s bullshit. “Free Speech” has become the new shield to wield supplanting “States Rights” and “Religious Freedom” to bash stupefied opponents into inaction. These folks are going to use the laws they like as blunt instruments because they don’t need sharp-edged weapons or the precision they require.

We’ve been warned. We aren’t paying attention.