Consequential Consequences: Thoughts on Oppenheimer

Every action has a reaction. So said Issac Newton and a host of scientists, mathematicians, and just about everyone else under the sun who came after him. I’d prefer to call reactions consequences. We’d like to think we can avoid consequences because the word conjures up a more dire consequence than just having a reaction. But we know we can’t. To hear Christopher Nolan talk about his terrific film, Oppenheimer, that’s what his film is about. Consequences. After an early morning viewing yesterday I’d agree. I’d say all the focus on Oppenheimer’s creating the first atomic bomb, undeniably consequential as it was, and filmed as well as it is, is the least consequential aspect of this film. 

Oppenheimer Emily Blunt Cillian Murphy

No, you can’t escape the story at the center of the plot. It’s a thriller, a mystery with some romance and political intrigue mixed in. It’s well told and well paced. If you’re a fan of Nolan’s almost frenetic editing pace it will engage and enthrall. If you’re not, it might be tough to get your footing early, but hang in there. Some of Nolan’s previous work has left me cold and often confused. Not here. I’d argue the plot at the center of this flick, even the lesser known political one, takes second fiddle to the character study of those who drive this story.

First, it’s a terrific cast of some of our most amazing actors working today. And every one one of them delivers. You get the sense that each of them, large role or small, was chomping at the bit to film each scene. Robert Downey is absolutely amazing. The quality of his work reminds me of his star turn in Chaplin. Just brilliant. Cillian Murphy tackles the central character with consumate skill and he deserves the accolades already bestowed and sure to come. But his central performance is almost eclipsed by the rest of the stellar ensemble cast when viewed as a whole. What each actor brings to whatever moments they are on the screen is so chocked full of truth, and yes consequences, that I found following them more explosive than the inevitable explosion. Notably, that comes with a huge chunk of the movie remaining.

And that’s the thing about this film that might just catapult it into classic status. Each moment tells us a powerful human story about choices and the consequences that flow from them, regardless of the scale of the choice at hand. It’s no accident that the closeups seem to outnumber the larger set pieces. We’re watching characters understand, in the moment, the implications of the things they’re thinking far into the future, whether it’s their personal future or the planet’s. Follow Emily Blunt’s incredible moments in the hearing to decide on Oppenheimer’s security clearance and you’ll see the second by second comprehension of every single thing that’s at stake for her personally, for her husband, and beyond. 

So I applaud Nolan, the cast and the rest of the filmmakers for taking such a consequential turning point in our history and focusing it so personally and intimately on those involved. And in so doing, hopefully making us take a breath and look at what might seem, in comparison, the inconsequential moments in our own lives, as well as some of the larger decsions moments we’re currently facing as a people. Before we turn them over to the robots.

As to the filmmaking it’s top notch. There’s one consequential decision that Nolan made in his story telling that I understand fully, but wish he’s strayed away from. Throughout the story, told through Oppenheimer’s eyes, we see him dreaming and visualizing the science he’s exploring as he tries to discover how to split the atom. Swirling waves and exploding particles dance through his head and across the screen via special effects. Nolan says it’s not CGI. Whatever it is, it’s done well, and like I said it makes sense. But in the final sequence of the movie I think Nolan went one special effect sequence too far. The movie was more powerfully over with the last words of the title character and doesn’t need that sequence. We all more than got the message, whether it’s the more personal one Nolan’s main character is reeling from, or the larger one he’s unleashed. 

And as a last thought, there was a part of me that was not looking forward to seeing this film because I had heard and read many complaints about the sound mix and not being able to hear the dialogue. I saw this film in a smaller, older theater not equipped with the latest and greatest projection and sound equipment. I had zero issues with the audio. I’m a big critic of lousy audio and visual magic doled out by creators playing with all sorts of new toys and tools. I know all the hype says to see it on the largest screen possible. Technology rules! Maybe so. But I was able to hear almost every word. Given the character study Nolan is essaying here, it made this gigantic and consequential film feel much more personal and thus more powerful and revelatory. Consequences. 

Can Jack Smith Rid Us Of This Orange Ogre?

So the decaying orange ogre, Donald Trump, announced he got a target letter from Jack Smith and it now appears we’ll move to yet another indcitment with more in the wings. Certainly there will be more to learn about all of this in the days that follow. I’m glad we’re finally getting down to brass tacks. Though I’m not sure how it changes the predicament we’re in.

Orangeogre

Opinions have been hardened for quite some time, even more so by the delay and dilly dallying. You’ve got folks who won’t budge off their support for Trump and you’ve got more folks who can’t wait to see him get his comeuppance. But we’re all still waiting and watching the show that this failed fabulist and crooked carbuncle is starring in. You can hear clocks ticking and smell the powder in the kegs.

I want to see this end. It’s not that I’m tired of the saga. But this story keeps screwing with my moral compass in ways that make it difficult to maintain any true direction.

I’m going to tell you a story from my childhood. Before I do, let me lay out a few points. First, I’m a believer in the Rule of Law. I don’t think we always follow that as intended and it’s getting abused by those who know better. Regardless, I believe in what it stands for. Second, the story you’re about to read is from my memory. There may be some facts I remember inaccurately, there may be some fuzziness on my part. Most of what I know I found out from conversations with relatives. None of that is intended to sway the story one way or the other. The essential facts are what they are. Third, I’m leaving out names here because I don’t know who is still alive and who is not. That doesn’t change the story and if anyone reads this who knows. Well, they know.

Now, the story.

I grew up in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains in Central Virginia. Rural area. Small population. When I graduated high school the total enrollment for the entire school was around 800 and the school was the only high school in the county. To say most of the folks were of the blue collar, hard working, salt of the earth type would be correct. We lived just outside of the county seat which was the main town. It had three major streets: Main Street, First Street, and Court Street; none long enough to break a sweat while walking them. The local businesses included a drug store, a department store, a hardware store, an appliance store, a bank, an old no longer operating hotel, a car dealership, the funeral parlor, a small general store, a barber shop, and a few offices. There was a church and a movie theatre. The courthouse sat at the top of the hill at the intersection of Main and Court streets. The town also had a small housing subdivision called Green Acres, named long before the TV series.

The main drag wasn’t Main Street. It was First Street. First Street was longer, had more businesses and homes on it and felt more Main. Heck, the parades all marched down First Street, not Main Street. It was confusing. But when the by-pass was completed around the town neither Main Street or First Street soon had anything left resembling what made them First or Main. So you get the picture.

Our county may not have had a large population but it had a disproportionate share of characters for its size. In the early 1960’s I went to grade school with the son of one of those characters. A ne’er-do-well troublemaker who spent most weekends in the county lockup for being drunk and disorderly or worse. One story says he went on a drunken spree one Saturday night and broke the windshield of every parked car along First Street. Another says he pulled a man from his car and almost stomped him to death.

One night, with his son in the car, he met a violent end to his violent life on a country road, (they were all country roads back then) from a shotgun blast.

It was well known how much and how frequently this guy created trouble. He was one of those folks that you just “knew was up to no good and would end up no good,” as one of my grandmothers used to say. Suffice it to say anyone who saw him walking down the street avoided him, and given the sparsity of streets that wasn’t an easy thing to do. Kids were warned about him. I imagine even a dog or two gave a snarl if he passed by.

He married a young girl after getting her pregnant. Their son was my classmate. The son was also constantly in trouble and in the principal’s office or suspended. That one apple didn’t fall far from the tree. Probably because he was constantly getting beaten to the ground. His dad constantly abused him and his mother. When he did show up for school he would often be quite bruised. Tongues wagged and “tsk, tsk’s” were numerous, but mostly there was silence.

One night, his mother had finally had enough after a beating. She called her family. Her dad and two brothers went looking for him. They caught up to him on that country road and one of them pulled the trigger that ended his story. But it didn’t end the story for our community.

The three were arrested. They didn’t put up much of a fuss as I understand it. They admitted what they had done and that they’d done it to protect their daughter/sister’s life. Legal proceedings proceeded. I’m not sure what their pleas were, but there was going to be a trial, so obviously it was not guilty in some form or the other.

And that’s when things got interesting. The local DA did his job and brought the charges. But it was determined that there was no probability of seating a jury that would convinct the three, so the case was dismissed. There was no attempt to move to another jurisdiction by the DA or the judge. As an aside, the judge lived next door to my other grandmother.

And you know what? As I recall I don’t think there was a soul to be found who didn’t think this was the best result. The silence resumed. But it was different. I was still in grade school. So most of how I remember this is through the reactions of my parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts and a few other adults. To a person they all thought justice had been done and not in any strange way.

At family gatherings at my maternal grandparents’ home, my cousins and I used to sneak up the stairs and listen to the adults’ conversations through one of the vents in the floor after they retired to the kitchen or the adjacent living room and the kids were dismissed to go out and play. Shortly after all of this came to its end, I remember the adults talking about the events and my grandmother repeatedly trying to change the subject. She finally put her foot down and said, “There’s right and there’s right. We’re all the better for it. Now let’s do the dishes.”

My classmate was never seen by us again. Shipped off to one of the military academies. And not much was ever spoken about the events again. At least not in my presence.

Years later when I was home from college for a weekend I asked my father about the incident. Not a man of many words, he simply said, “The man was bad to the bone. What happened happened and it should have happened a long time ago. Period.” My dad always ended conversations he didn’t want to continue with the word “period.”

And that was that.

I haven’t thought much about these memories in quite awhile. But as we’ve all been forced to live these last six or so years with this menace called Trump debauching everything, everyone and every idea and ideal we’ve supposedly built a society on, I have to admit I’ve found myself losing patience with the Rule of Law. These memories keeps creeping  back in each time we hear of some new outrageous moment in this ongoing saga and I find myself mucking around with my moral compass wondering why we just can’t find quicker ways to put what we all know is wrong behind us before anymore damage is done.

I don’t think I’m alone with those feelings. Everyone knows what we’re watching and living through. The ogre is holding the town hostage. Everyone knows it and goes on with life the best they can with his shadow looming large. Maybe Jack Smith is the one to bring the ogre’s reign of terror to an end. Maybe he’ll also restore a bit of my faith in the Rule of Law. I hope so. Give this ogre what he deserves. Do it the right way, sure. But if not, don’t let this decaying orange ogre wriggle out of another one. Paraphrasing grandma and quoting my dad, “there’s right and then there’s right. We’ll all be better off for it. Period.”

The Trump Trial(s) Farce

It’s always a disappointment when you read or view a story and you realize you’re ahead of the characters becuase the plot is too thin and so well worn. You can close the book, click off the remote or leave the theatre. Tougher to do in these fraught times with the Trump farce we’re all forced to live through, because hey, you know it affects our lives. It may be farce. It may feel comical or tragicomic. But the laughs are empty and hollow.

Punch and Judy

At the moment it’s all getting played out as entertainment. Because that’s all that’s really left. It’s obviously lucrative for the players and the storytellers even though the audience knows the storyline, the characters, and what the next moves will be. Will there be surprises? I’m sure there will be a few. But in the end, nothing that happens in the early going will change how you feel about the finale. No one was ever surprised at a Punch and Judy show.

This morning comes the predictable news that the decaying orange turd is asking for a delay. The only possible twist  is what his hand-picked judge will do. I’m guessing she’ll stay in character and that will just prolong the story needlessly.

Lordy, I wish someone, somehow tied up in this tale would come up with an original twist or turn.

Peter Brook Takes on Artificial Intelligence (Well, Sorta Kinda)

News on so-called Artificial Intelligence continues to fill up the digital pages, social networks, air and cable waves with more words, words, words than you can shake a Complete Works of Shakespeare at. Abridged or unabriged. It’s truly amazing how ravenous the appetite for info on this is. But then again it isn’t.

Peterbrookatthc3a9c3a2tredesbouffesdunord photobysimonannand 2 860x516

The purveyors of AI are running so fast with something so incomplete that while the technology is impressive on one hand, they are welcoming the slight of the other. It’s not all smoke and mirrors, but there’s certainly enough smoke to make any reflection feel a bit hazy. We’re told AI is everything from our salvation to the end of it all. There’s a lot of sound and fury from all sides, signifying not much more at the moment than a lot of sound and fury.

I was re-reading some of legendary director Peter Brook’s writings this morning and I stumbled on this quote. I think it comes extremely close to pinning down what’s missing in this moment. Keep in mind this quote was published in his 2013 book, The Quality of Mercy: Reflections on Shakespeare. 

Yes. You read that correctly. 2013. Brook left us in July 2022.

Once a computer was asked, “What is truth?” It took a very long time before the reply came back, “I will tell you a story…”

/end scene.

Sunday Morning Reading

As the picture says, I’m on lake time this Sunday morning. So the list of suggested Sunday Morning Reading topics is a shorter one. Here’s hoping you find a little weekend time to chill as well.

OnLakeTime

Theatre and opera director Adele Thomas talks about her beginnings, her art and her career and how artists and the challenges (financial and otherwise) that directors face trying to get a career going. Good interview by Fiona Maddocks.

A great piece from Lisa Melton: My Coming Out Party

A couple of interesting pieces on Artificial Intelligence:

Artificial Stimulated Stupidty by Robert E. Wright and Is AI a Snake That Eats Itself? by Om Malik both reflect some of my thoughts on the topic.

And while the world is watching Orcas attack yachts and other sea-going craft, here’s a piece on The Giant Whale That Terrorized Constantinople.

If you’re interseted in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here.

Sunday Morning Reading

Some Sunday Morning Reading for Father’s Day. There’s no real theme to this week’s edition. Which is fitting. We used to joke that my Dad had a new hobby every six months. He did. But that just demonstrated his endless curiosity about the world around us. I think I got some of that tossed into my mix. So here’s a pot-pourri of topics to share. 

Blanche monniers news

Humans aren’t mentailly ready for a lot of things. So called Artificial Intelligence is certainly one of them. Thor Benson tells us why that might be the case

Nicholas Casey tells a great spy story in The Spy Who Called Me.

Barbara Kinsolver is a great writer. Her latest book Demon Copperfield brings a dive into Dickens for a tale from Appalachia. Lisa Allardice has written a terrific profile on Kingsolver. 

Pennsylvania apparently is one of the key stomping grounds for the Christian Right’s desire to spin us back to the dark ages. Frederick Clarkson gives us an excllent look into this. 

Why Is Everyone Watching TV With the Subtitles On? Devin Gordon offers up some answers. Mine’s simple: Selfish stupid filmmaking. 

What came first the chicken or the egg? Well that age-old riddle leaves the rest of the egg-laying species out of the question. Intriguing piece by Nisha Zahid. 

And while we’re talking about the riddles that plague humans about the non-humans sharing our planet, Ari Daniel highlights an article in Cell that says an Octopuses can tweak the RNA in their brains to adjust to warmer and cooler waters. 

This is a scary and sad tale. Gina Dimuro tells us about Blanche Monnier. Her parents locked her in her room for 25 years after she fell in love with the wrong kind of guy.

If you’re interseted in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here

Everybody’s Happy Now Trump Has Been Indicted Again

Everybody’s happy. Everybody got their wish. The decaying orange turd that is Donald Trump has been indicted. Again. This time in Federal court on charges of…well if you don’t know you’re living in a cave and perhaps better off. But the bottom line is everybody is happy. And I mean everybody.

Greyclowns

Those who want to see him held accountable and get his legal commeuppance will inhale any whiff of hope and chant hallelujahs in helium-like voices. Take your victories when and when you can.

Those deep in the cult or just in thrall to this miserable excuse of a cult leader are thrilled that their leader keeps muddling along on his road to martyrdom.

The Grifters get to keep on grifting like the lickspittle lampreys they are. If their shark ever stops swimming they’ll wash up on shore like fish on a Texas beach or an algae bloom in Florida.

The traditional media is also counting their windfall. They’re thrilled to death that this circus is going to continue so they can continue their clowning.

Social media companies are doing the same kind of accounting knowing users will provide the grist for its mills.

The Dems are thrilled because they know this will be the distraction they need as their counterparts continue to fall over backwards to see who can be the biggest idiot. The ruckus will keep the Dems from having to go on the attack. Which is a blessing and a curse since that they don’t seem to know how to do that.

The Republicans are also thrilled. See Grifters above as a start. But more to the point it keeps them from having to address real issues. On the face of it the Republican candidates for the nomination might look like they have a tough row to hoe, but they don’t. Most were hoping for this and plan on playing the waiting game, hoping the decaying orange turd will eventually self-destruct. It’s a strategy. It’s not a good one. Neither is anything else.

Merrick Garland is overjoyed. The heat is off. For the moment.

The donors are ecstatic. They can keep their money parked and working for them for awhile longer before having to commit.

The rest of the world just keeps laughing.

So, it’s happiness all the way round. And round and round we go. Endlessly.

Sunday Morning Reading

Charisma might be the theme of some of this week’s edition of Sunday Morning Reading. Or maybe it’s our fasicnation with folks who seem to marshall it for mischief. The theme runs through a range of topics from Artificial Intelligence to the media with a few other subjects tossed on the reading pile. Speaking of charisma and mischief marshaling, these articles all came my way as we were absorbing the news of the Trump indictment this week. I wrote a little something about that here.

Unknown 2

Om Malik stands as much in dismay as I do at how much time the media spotlights charlatans in Media and Monsters.

Joe Zadeh takes a look at the The Secret History and Strange Future of Charisma. It features this quote from Ernst Glöckner.

“I knew: This man is doing me violence — but I was no longer strong enough. I kissed the hand he offered and with choking voice uttered: ‘Master, what shall I do?’”

We’ve witnessed quite a few falls from grace this week. None more glaring than CNN’s Chris Licht. Mark Jacob in the Courier breaks down the difference between platforming and journalism. The latter Licht’s lickspittling helped slide further down the reputation damage scale. 

Morality is declining. That seems to be something most believe at the moment. Data says otherwise according to Mariana Lenharo. 

Jeff Jarvis followed a court case in which a couple of lawyers had to own up for submitting nonexistant citations and cases created by ChatGPT. 

John Warner lays out an excellent long read on why Speed and Efficiency are Not Human Values. Yes, it’s AI related but you’ll also find a little Korsakov, Tolstoy and Prince in the mix. 

James Grissom claims he received a phone call from playwright Tennessee Williams, who asked Grissom to “be my witness.” After a meetiing with Williams, Grissom takes the names Williams gives him and proceeds to follow the playwright’s wish: “I would like you to ask these people if I ever mattered.” Grissom turned it into a calling card, a book and a career. Lots of folks doubt the whole thing. Helen Shaw tackles the story in Did This Writer Actually Know Tennesee Williams?

David Todd McCarthy takes on our fascination with the unprecdented in America Grows Up.

Sabrina Imbler tells us the story of The Strange Case of the Woman Who Gave Birth To Rabbits. 

And to end this week’s edition of Sunday Morning Reading here’s a piece by Melissa Cunningham about Jenny Graves. Why are we still singing about Adam and Eve when there’s so much gorgeous science out thre is the world that explains our origins.” That’s the question Jenny Graves, an evolutionary geneticist, asked herself on her way to creating a libretto based on Joseph Hayden’s The Creation. Melissa Cunningham tells the story 

If you’re interseted in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here. 

Sunday Morning Reading

Some complex, challenging, and excellent writing to share with you today covering everything from big picture politics to the small, media meanderings and meltdowns, and some interesting tech analysis heading into Apple’s big mixed reality headset announcement at its WorldWide Developer Conference tomorrow. Hope you find the suggestions fascinating. I do. 

Unknown 3

Chilling read. Ryan Busse, a former gun executive talks to ProPublica’s Corey G. Johnson about the danger of increasing radicalization in the industry

The subhead for this piece, “The view from nowhere came from somewhere” should have been the title instead of The Invention of Objectivity. Regardless Darrell Hartman lays out a good read about how “objectivity” came to the New York Times. Subjectively speaking pretending that journalism can be unbiased is not a bias I subscribe to. 

David Todd McCarthy walks along The Edge of Defeat in today’s political battles between progressives and establishment loyalists. Note: McCarthy is also setting up a new publication focusing on his political writings and musings called Rome Magazine. Also worth your time while the world burns. 

Peter Turchin in The Atlantic adapts some of his book End Times (a good read) into an article called America is Headed Toward Collapse. He argues that history can show us how to muck our way through our present day “discord” as we have done twice before. I’m not sure history is going to be so kind this time around. 

Anyone paying attention to the goings on at CNN leading up to and following the recent “town hall” featuring the conman known as the former president will find this behind the scenes feature by Tim Alberta in the Atlantic a fascinating read. The title certainly points to where it’s going: Inside the Meltdown at CNN

Big pictures are complex. Neil Theise’s book Notes on Complexity: A Scientific Theory of Connection, Concsicousness, and Being tackles some of that complexity. In this article he lays out five key insights from his book. 

Smart People are Falling for Stupid Lies by Kathryn Joyce in Vanity Fair is another article that racks the big picture political focus down to the view inside local battles in a specific county. These type of articles are enormously helpful in shedding light on the fact that the problems we face aren’t just top down but also bottom up, and how both feed the frenzy. Here’s another one from February in Politico about Ottawa Country, Michigan.

Om Malik tosses a bit of reality into the hype fire surrounding Apple’s headest to be unveiled tomorrow.

One more piece on Apple’s upcoming headset. David Pierce at the Verge says If Apple Wants Its Headset To Win, It Needs to Reinvent the App.I don’t agree with some of the things David lays out, but his central thesis is spot on.

If you’re interseted in just what the heck Sunday Morning Reading is all about you can read more about the origins of Sunday Morning Reading here